Showing posts with label 權力 Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 權力 Power. Show all posts

Friday, June 18, 2021

生活「大重設」的風險與企業應對:淘寶11億客戶資料被爬蟲軟件盜取 涉用戶ID及電話號碼

 


美國《華爾街日報》報道,河南地方法院的判決書透露,一名中國軟件開發商以一款自行研發的網絡爬蟲軟件(web-crawling software),自2019年11月起自動存取淘寶網站數據,收集的資料包括用戶部份身份資料、流動電話號碼以及用戶評語等,更於長達8個月內秘密收集超過11億條用戶資訊。

淘寶是中國的網上大型購物平台,近日被發現遭網絡爬蟲軟件盜取 11 億條客戶資料,當中更包括用戶的電話號碼以及部分身份資料。持有淘寶網站的阿里巴巴集團(Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.)揭發之後報警,發言人未有透露有多少用戶受影響。阿里巴巴發言人表示,公司主動發現事件,並配合執法部門的工作以保障用戶,但其未有透露受影響的用戶數目,但表示當中不涉及用戶資料售賣予第三方或任何經濟損失,同時亦未有回應有否通知受影響客戶。該網絡爬蟲軟件雖未取得密碼等加密數據,但仍能取得部分未公開的資料為其公司服務的客戶作網上推廣之用。最後該工程師及其僱主被判監超過三年。

案情只是顯示被差役捕獲的情況,其他零敲碎打、侵入網絡盜竊資料的事件該如恒河沙數。世界經濟論壇借助假瘟疫在二〇二〇年推出「大重設」(The Great Re-set)的同時,就在《全球風險報告2021》警告交易網絡化的資訊盜竊危機。這是權力的弔詭,即是說,推出離地、離群的網絡生活世界之後,不久警告資訊盜竊危機的風險,之後又法律及加密軟件之類來防護,於是就形成拉鋸的便利與風險的槓桿關係,這就是權力的形成關係。之後,就可以銷售更多產品服務了。原先只是社區的、在地的供應鏈,現在社區的、在地的供應鏈仍在,網上交易提供了額外的購物和服務選擇,補充不足,也開發新的商品流通。

明白了這種現代社會的權力與商業運作模型,就可以調整一下你的心態,安排工作和重新營業了。生活化的網絡交易是multiplication (繁衍) and realignment (重組),不是replacement (代替)and displacement(排擠)。


Source: 陳雲

https://www.patreon.com/posts/sheng-huo-da-she-52638190

Sunday, March 29, 2020

病毒是醫學,防疫是政治

病毒是醫學,防疫是政治。港共不是要防疫,而是要劃出一個時間的空檔,制定香港人民的biometrics(生物辨識術/生物測定法則),之後在其他正常日子,好好使用。

各位看看圖畫,在量度的時候,差役與餐廳食客的距離並非1.5米,而是無限制地接近,在一個理論上已經可以感染你的距離。在餐廳阿姐、大廈看更給你採集體溫數據的時候,距離並非1.5米,而是無限制地接近,在一個已經可以感染你的距離。昨晚的餐廳檢查顯示,當差役進入餐廳的時候,他們是不會被餐廳職員量度體溫的。

量度者是不計算biometrics的,被量度者要遵守biometrics,這是subject與object的關係,權力行使者與權力接受者的關係。你要遵守,他們不需要遵守,這就是傅柯說的權力(power)。只准州官放火,不准百姓點燈。從古代到現代,權力都是這樣行使的,只是古代的貴族權力收藏在宮廷,現代的民選政府的權力的悖論要做到在街頭給你看見為止!

為什麼一個普通的餐廳職員、大廈看更阿伯,在特首頒布的法例之後,可以忽然變身成為一個量度體溫的專業人士?他們在無限制距離接觸市民的時候,有否經過無菌、無病毒的檢定?無囉。他們只是經過權力轉身,只是經過power transformation,no training and no qualification needed。這些幫你量度體溫的餐廳洗碗大姐和打瞌睡躲懶的看更阿伯,他們呼出的氣息可以接近你鼻孔的時候,你有沒有一刻懷疑過他們可以即時感染你?不會囉,因為你信任權力。他們好像文革期間的紅衛兵那樣,戴了紅袖章就是紅衛兵,他們不是經過軍訓和遵守軍規的解放軍,於是紅衛兵可以更自由地虐殺人。

為什麼這段期間,大廈管理公司可以容許60歲以上的高危年齡群組的看更阿伯上班,執行任務?為什麼不遵守醫學建議,給他們放有薪假期,好好保護這群老人?不會囉。

這是權力的悖論,權力就是靠悖論(paradox)來執行的,我在哲學課堂講述過,哲學不是什麼虛無飄渺的學問,是非常之實在的,大家可以親眼見到的。(當然,要有好的哲學家導師。不是哲學家,無法講哲學課。)

香港人,你們明白了沒有?Power must be seen and measured and disrupted by the executor.  現代的權力,一定要被看見、被量度(這裡用標尺)而且被執行者違反,才是權力。圖畫當中,右邊的差役低了頭,很不好受,因為他內心大概知道自己太接近顧客,違反了1.5米的所謂防疫距離。左邊的差役,做事心無障礙,日後可以升官發財。

裡面最正常的,是一隻好奇的小狗,他/她在想:你班人類在做乜鳩?(對不起,我將人類的粗口給了小狗狗。)

政府在防疫?我講了三個月,你今日明白了吧。我講述傅柯的時候,老早講過的。在全世界,只有我在最緊要的時刻,向各位介紹傅柯的哲學。

你以為哲學無用?深層國家是根據哲學來制定統治方法的,裡面有一個人懂得,就可以統治一億人。人類在統治者眼中,只是一堆biometrics。

為什麼2003年沙士期間,不會搞這些無聊防疫措施,而是前線醫護拼命救人,微生物學家拼命研究沙士病毒的基因排序,市面的市民大眾拼命維持消費和繁榮,沒人逼你戴口罩,大家咬緊牙根互相支援,香港一切生活如常?

當中的差別,是因為當時在中環雪廠街的舊政府總部坐了一個哲學家的政府研究總監,他的名字叫陳雲。現在他被共產黨及泛民排擠,丟失公職、教席及八個報紙專欄,無法在公共輿論發表評論,否則我這篇文章會在《信報》或《明報》出現。

(圖片來源:網絡)

Source: 陳雲

https://www.facebook.com/589657224/posts/10158013989222225/

Thursday, March 12, 2020

A Crisis is the Perfect Time to Seize Power

“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery,” Thomas Jefferson once said. That sentiment has been somewhat seared onto the American conscience ever since; but while the trajectory of Jefferson’s life indicates that he meant it, do we?

A quick glance back over our country’s history would suggest we do not.

During times of “crisis,” both perceived and real, history instead shows a nation that is, for the most part, readily willing to give up essential liberties in exchange for promised security. It also portrays a government that is more than willing to capitalize on the fears of its people and use a crisis to expand its power.

After the attacks of 9/11, we saw one of the largest expansions of government occur right before our eyes. The 4th amendment right to privacy was eviscerated with the passage of the Patriot Act a mere six weeks after the buildings came down. The few civil libertarians who raised concerns about this drastic response were hushed with assurances that the bill would sunset.

Instead, we still live under its continual renewals to this day, and we know (thanks to American hero and whistleblower Edward Snowden) that the encroachments on our rights have in actuality far-surpassed even the bill’s permissive statutes on surveillance of American citizens.

Few even bother to protest this new normal anymore. What’s worse, it seems a lot of people have been convinced that these programs actually keep them safe and would prefer to give up this essential human right for that assurance — even without evidence that it is true.

So make no mistake as we move into the most recent crisis within our borders, the Coronavirus, there will be many seeking to grow the government’s control in the name of security. And unfortunately, there will also be a lot of Americans willing to follow their leaders right off that cliff because they’re afraid.

Already, we’ve seen proponents of authoritarian governments, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, use the 38 deaths under this illness in the U.S. to call for unrelated responses like mortgage-relief, cancelling student loans, and universal basic income.


There’ve also been (inevitable) calls for giving the same government that can’t figure out how to disperse testing kits for COVID-19 complete control of our healthcare. It makes sense if you don’t think about it whatsoever.

And, as of last night, President Trump has used the pandemic to cease travel between the U.S. and many other countries — an action that, let’s be honest, has been his desire all along.

In a crisis there are precautions to take, and there are ways to help your fellow man without depending on the government to come in and take control of your life. Offer to go get groceries or other supplies for those actually at risk right now (the elderly and immunocompromised), wash your hands and don’t be gross. Stay away from large crowds.

But don’t get crazy and hand over your liberties to the entity least capable of actually protecting you — the government.


Source: Hannah Cox